Biomass vs. Fossil Fuels: Cost & Carbon Benefits

2 min read
WhatsApp share
Twitter share
LinkedIn share
Instagram share
Facebook share
Biomass vs. Fossil Fuels: Cost & Carbon Benefits
Emerge Solution Advertisement Mobile

Today’s world is energy-conscious. When you learn to compare biomass and fossil fuels, you will know the potential they hold. As the world is facing growing energy demands, it is now a case of biomass versus fossil fuel. While both power our industries and homes, they come with different bills, both in pocket and planet terms. Let's compare their affordability and carbon impact.

Cost Comparison

  • Biomass Fuel Costs:

    • Readily available in many regions from agricultural or forestry waste

    • Lower long-term costs due to local sourcing and price stability

    • Potential for energy independence and reduced transportation expenses

  • Fossil Fuel Costs:

    • Prone to global price fluctuations and market volatility

    • Supported by government subsidies that mask the true economic impact

    • Includes hidden costs like environmental degradation and public health issues

  • Total Cost of Ownership:

    • Biomass systems may require initial setup, but offer lower ongoing maintenance

    • Fossil fuel infrastructure is mature but incurs high operational and environmental costs

    • Long-term, biomass can deliver more consistent returns with fewer external risks

3. Carbon Impact

  • Biomass refers to a variety of plant and animal material. The basic idea behind biomass being considered carbon-neutral is that the CO2 it gives off when burnt is approximately equal to the CO2 that gets absorbed by the plants while it was growing.

  • Fossil fuels release ancient, stored carbon. This type of carbon is carbon-positive, meaning it will create more CO₂ in the atmosphere. Today, the outcome is a warmer world.

  • To put this into perspective, biomass emits around 230–380 kg CO₂/MWh, compared to coal, which emits more than 900 kg CO₂/MWh. Also, burning these things can create methane and black carbon, both powerful greenhouse gases.

Real-World Relevance

  • How businesses or industries are shifting

  • Any regional case studies or India-specific insights (if B2B/local focus)

  • Policy incentives or industry uptake

Conclusion

India’s energy consumption patterns are changing rapidly. Half of the total 476 gigawatts (GW) of installed power capacity is from non-fossil sources. The government’s policy now mandates that thermal power plants use 5% biomass as co-firing, which will increase to 7% next year. It also supports biomass with production incentives for pellets, briquettes and bio-CNG. Biomass is available in abundance with great potential; however, its installed capacity and contribution to grid power are far less than that of coal, which remains essential to industry growth and energy security.

Looking to explore biomass solutions for your business? Reach out to us at Headsup B2B.

Loading...